Email ID
Password
Sign me in automatically next time
Clinica
Airport body scanners and the risk/benefit question
13 November 2008
Amanda Maxwell , Editor, European Regulatory Affairs

airport_scan_amsterdam_300x358
Quite a revelation: The impressive result of an airport scan
When my 20-year-old daughter, Anna, told me that she was intending to participate in some research at her psychology department at a leading London university which would involve her having several MRI scans in return for a small recompense, I nearly hit the roof. Sometimes we know of the benefits of medical equipment, and they are immeasurable for those for whom a diagnosis is life-saving or vastly improves their quality of life, while we really do not know the full extent of the risks.

So when I was faced with the prospect of a body scanner at Heathrow airport, I took the option to refuse. At least there was an option at that time. I, for one, would feel my rights had been violated if I had to undergo a body scan at an airport, forced to accept what I see as a medical risk for no medical benefit.

Now, I read that the European Commission held a workshop on November 6 as a first step in addressing the impact of aviation security measures and body scanners on human rights, privacy, personal dignity, health and data protection.

I can barely believe matters have reached this point. It seems totally staggering and highlights the madness that can prevail in the EU. On the one hand, we have had the threat of the Commission introducing new rules for MRI that would have severely limited its use when there are proven significant and life saving medical benefits, and now, on the other, the Commission is considering exposing citizens, many thousands of whom are regular flyers, to full body scanners.

I can see the argument for body scanners, especially in these days of terrorist threats. Also, if it puts an end of the invasive surgical glove scenario, that has to be good.

We await more details about two new screening technologies that are now being trialled. I know nothing about them. But what I do know is that to the same extent that we are not aware of significant risks with scanners, nor can we be absolutely sure of the full story about the impact on health of long-term frequent exposure.

Of course, they may be totally safe – even in frequent use. But my policy is not to expose myself or my children to such technology unless I am absolutely clear that the benefits are going to outweigh the risks.

I look to history. We have all been exposed to so many chemicals for so long without question, and now many are being placed on danger lists. Can we really be arrogant enough to think that we know everything about the safety of scanners?

And in case you are wondering what happened with Anna, she did some waitressing instead!

 
Not a subscriber ?  
 
EVENTS
19 March 2012
Montreux Convention and Music Centre, Switzerland
23 June 2012
Bilbao, Spain
 
© 2012 Informa plc. All rights reserved.
This site is owned and operated by Informa plc ("Informa") whose registered office is Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London, W1T 3JH. Registered in England and Wales. Number 3099067. UK VAT Group: GB 365 4626 36